How to Govern an Empire? The Inscriptions of Darius I As a Constitutional Program
Abstract
The Old Persian inscriptions of Darius I refer to a range of legal – particularly constitutional – questions. The famous tomb inscription from Naqsh-e Rustam (DNb), it is argued, represents a conceptional mission statement for Darius’ vision of governance. The text of DNb is amplified and echoed in other inscriptions of the Great King, the sum of which is akin to a “constitutional” declaration. The paper posits that this “constitutional corpus” and the resulting legal framework it expounds bring to light two major notions: first, the “constitution” of the Achaemenid empire is much more than a pure adaptation or transition of former Mesopotamian kingships (for example by Assyrian or Babylonian traditions); and second, the constitutional framework of the royal texts indirectly reflects the debates taking place among the empire’s leading élites, which were likely conducted behind the scenes. Against this background, it is time to reconsider the statement of Fritz Gschnitzer, namely, that a constitutional discussion, as reported by Herodotus for Darius’ claim to power, would be a strictly “Greek” element. Finally, the transmission of an Achaemenid constitutional concept might have provided an impetus for the ways in which the Hellenistic monarchies organized the administration and government of their multiethnic and multicultural empires (“Großreiche”).
Citation
Klinkott, Hilmar. "How to Govern an Empire? The Inscriptions of Darius I As a Constitutional Program." Pourdavoud Center: The World of Ancient Iran and the West (May 19, 2022).